PATRICK HENRY AND JAMES MADISON DEBATE STATES’ RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AT THE VIRGINIA RATIFYING CONVENTION
PATRICK HENRY: Make the best of this new government - say
it is composed by anything but inspiration - you ought to be extremely cautious,
watchful, jealous of your liberty; for, instead of securing your rights, you may
lose them forever. If a wrong step be now made, the republic may be lost
forever. If this new government will not come up to the expectation of the
people, and they shall be disappointed, their liberty will be lost, and tyranny
must and will arise....We are come hither to preserve the poor commonwealth of
Virginia, if it can possibly be done: something must be done to preserve your
liberty and mine. . . .
I have the highest veneration for those gentlemen; but sir, give me leave to demand, What right had they to say, We, the people? My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask: Who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states? States are the characteristics and the soul of confederation. If the states be not the agents of this compact, it must be one, great, consolidated, national government, of the people of all states.
Here is a resolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished: and cannot we plainly see that this is actually the case? The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press, all your immunities and franchises, all pretensions to human rights and privileges, are rendered insecure, if not lost, by this change, so loudly talked of by some, and inconsiderately by others.
If we admit this consolidate government, it will be because we like a great, splendid one. Some way or other we must be a great and mighty empire; we must have an army, and a navy, and a number of things. When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: liberty, sir, was then the primary object.
JAMES MADISON: There are a number of opinions, but the
principal question is whether it be a federal or a consolidated government.... I
conceive myself that it is of a mixed nature; it is in a manner unprecedented;
we cannot find one express example in the experience of the world. It stands by
itself. In some respects it is a government of a federal nature; in others, it
is of a consolidated nature. Even if we attend to the manner in which the
Constitution is investigated, ratified, and made the act of the people of
America, I can say, notwithstanding what the honorable gentleman has alleged,
that this government is not completely consolidated, nor is it entirely federal.
Who are the parties to it? The people - but not the people as composing one
great body, but the people as composing thirteen sovereignties. Were it, as the
gentleman asserts, a consolidated government, the assent of a majority of the
people would be sufficient for its establishment; and, as a majority have
adopted it already, the remaining states would be bound by the act of the
majority, even if they unanimously rejected it.... But, sir, no state is bound
by it, as it is, without its own consent. Should all the states adopt it, it
will be then a government established by the thirteen states of America, not
through the intervention of the legislatures, but by the people at large. In
this particular respect the distinction between the existing and the proposed
governments is very material. The existing system has been derived from the
dependent derivative authority of the legislatures of the states; whereas, this
is derived from the superior power of the people.
I wish this government may answer the expectation of its friends and foil the apprehension of its enemies. I hope the patriotism of the people will continue and be a sufficient guard to their liberties. I believe its tendency will be that the state governments will counteract the general interest and ultimately prevail.
To return to the HIS 103 Documents page, please click here.
To return to the main webpage, please click here.